The Buckeye Institute and Liberty Justice Center score another victory for public employees.
Three Kent State University custodians have now become able to resign from their government union as part of a settlement in Hannay v. Board of Trustees of Kent State University.
This article was written by Kevin Mooney and first appeared February 10, 2019 on CapitalResearch.org. Summary: The school choice movement in Pennsylvania has remained at a
Seven current and former Pennsylvania state employees have filed a lawsuit in federal court seeking to get back dues they claim they were forced to pay to a union that did not represent them.
If they’re successful, approximately 10,000 people could end up getting $3 million back.
HARRISBURG, Pa. (WHTM) – A group of Pennsylvania state employees has filed a lawsuit against AFSCME Council 13, the government union that represents thousands of state employees in Pennsylvania.
Seven current and former state employees filed the federal class-action lawsuit, looking to recoup “fair share” fees taken out of their paychecks and sent to the union.
The U.S. Supreme Court in 2018 ruled in Janus v. AFSCME that those fees are not constitutional.
Labor union AFSCME represents many of the workers there. Schaszberger was never a member, but as was the case in many unionized workplaces, he still had dues deducted from his checks.
“Over the course of my 11 years with the commonwealth, they took about $4,000 out of my pay,” he said at a press conference announcing the suit.
“They chose not to join the union yet they were forced to pay these monthly union fees just so they could continue to work for public service,” Kelsey said. “Think about that. These people were forced to pay money to a political organization just so they could keep their jobs. That is wrong.”
Schaszberger says he was forced to pay union fees to Harrisburg-based AFSCME Council 13, even though he wasn’t a union member.
“I didn’t seek their representation, I didn’t want their representation, and I didn’t feel that they represented my interests anyway,” Schaszberger said. “So, to be forced to pay them as part of my job just didn’t seem right.”
oday, a group of Pennsylvania state employees sued AFSCME, one of the Commonwealth’s largest public sector unions. The U.S. Supreme Court says it is illegal to require public employees to pay union fees as a condition of employment. Pennsylvania state employees who were forced to pay these fees prior to the Court’s decision are demanding a refund.
Seven current and former Pennsylvania state employees filed a federal class-action lawsuit against AFSCME Council 13, demanding the union return money taken from their paychecks for union “agency” or “fair share” fees prior to the Court’s 2018 ruling in Janus v. AFSCME. If successful, these workers and nearly 10,000 other state employees could recoup up to $3 million that the union took from them.
The law firm that brought the landmark case Janus v. AFSCME before the U.S. Supreme Court last year sued Gov. Andrew Cuomo on Thursday over an executive order he signed to block union foes from seeking the contact information of state employees.
The Liberty Justice Center filed a petition this week in the New York Supreme Court in Albany, accusing the state of attempting to block workers’ constitutional rights by not releasing government employees’ ZIP codes. The center says an executive order limiting that information makes it harder to locate workers and notify them of their rights not to participate in unions.
StandWithWorkers.org is operated by the Liberty Justice Center. There is a lot of misinformation surrounding the Janus decision. StandWithWorkers.org serves as an educational resource to help government workers understand their options.
This website (the “Site”) is provided for informational purposes only. The information and materials contained herein are not intended to and do not constitute legal advice or the formation of an attorney-client relationship. Although the information on this Site relates to legal issues, no attorney-client relationship is created between you and the Liberty Justice Center and/or its employees when you use the Site or its materials. The information provided on this Site may not apply to your particular facts or circumstances; accordingly, you should seek legal counsel from a licensed attorney concerning your particular issues. Please be advised that if you submit information to us via this Site, no attorney-client relationship is created, and any such communications are not considered confidential.
© 2024 Liberty Justice Center, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
